Report Overview

The COVID-19 pandemic has caused complex challenges across the apprenticeship landscape. The unique position of apprenticeships – which combine education, training and employment – has made the sector particularly vulnerable to the current health crisis. Impacts on training providers and access to learning are being compounded by the profound impacts on employers and the economy. Some apprentices, particularly those working in the sectors and industries most adversely affected by COVID-19, are being made redundant, being furloughed or experiencing breaks in learning, with a minority of apprentices able to continue their apprenticeships as normal. For those apprentices who have been able to continue their learning, this has moved online, raising further issues: Not all will have equal access to required devices, internet access or a suitable home learning space, leaving them unable to access training.

This report, the third in our series of COVID-19 Impact Briefs, authored by Katherine Doherty and Carl Cullinane looks at how the pandemic is impacting the apprenticeship sector, in particular those from disadvantaged backgrounds.

Our companion report, Degree Apprenticeships: Levelling Up?, explores whether degree apprenticeships are delivering for social mobility, highlighting that many employers are using the degree apprenticeship scheme to fund senior-level programmes, instead of helping young people access the workplace.


Just two in five apprenticeships were continuing as normal in April.


Almost half of apprentices had been furloughed or made redundant.


The percentage of employers who reported some apprentices were unable to work remotely.

Key Findings

• The COVID-19 health crisis is having significant impacts on apprentices, their employers and learning providers. Companies are furloughing or making staff redundant, off the job learning has been disrupted, and apprentices, already on low pay, have faced additional financial strains.

Many young people from disadvantaged backgrounds undertake apprenticeships. They are more likely to be concentrated in apprenticeships at lower levels, be paid lower salaries and be vulnerable to furloughing and redundancies a result of the health crisis.

• Going forward, employers are unlikely to be recruiting apprentices in the numbers we have seen recently, meaning there will be fewer apprenticeship vacancies available for young people to access and more competition for the fewer opportunities.

• In the first half of 2019/20, apprenticeship starts were already down by 7% on last year and we expect these to drop significantly further for the rest of the year.

• As of early April, employers surveyed reported that on average just 39% of apprenticeships were continuing as normal, with 36% having been furloughed and 8% made redundant. 17% of apprentices had their off-the-job learning suspended.

• On average, these employers felt that 81% of their apprentices would return to their course once economic restrictions were relaxed. 58% were confident all their apprentices would return, while 17% reported that fewer than half of their apprentices would resume.

Around a third (31%) reported that they were likely to hire fewer apprentices over the coming year, or none at all.

Firms worried about their ability to survive the crisis were more likely to say their apprentices were unlikely to resume, and more likely to cut future apprenticeship recruitment. Half of such businesses reported they would be recruiting fewer apprenticeships, or none at all. This picture is likely to have worsened since April.

• Apprentices themselves are encountering significant challenges. 37% of surveyed employers reported that some of their apprentices were not able to work from home due to a lack of equipment, or because their role was not suitable for such work. A further 14% said some apprentices could not access learning from home due to a lack of internet or devices.

• Employers are encountering a variety of issues with their apprentices. A quarter (24%) of employers surveyed reported that a learning provider had closed, with 16% reporting that a learning provider had been unable to continue provision for other reasons. While 16% said apprentices had been redeployed to other ‘keyworker’ roles in the business, 29% reported that their apprentices did not yet have the skills for such redeployment.

• With young people now not in school or college to access face to face career guidance or able to attend networking events or work experience opportunities it will be harder for disadvantaged young people to access high quality information and skills needed to secure an apprenticeship.


1) The current support measures for apprenticeship training providers do not go far enough. The COVID supplier relief scheme for training providers should also cover levy-funded apprenticeships, in order to ensure that providers survive the crisis and can drive the next generation of apprenticeships.

2) The priority for current apprentices should be to continue training where possible, even when on furlough or if redeployed within a company. This can create a virtuous circle for the apprentice, provider and employer.

3) The government should require employers to top up the wages of furloughed apprentices up to the appropriate minimum wage for all usual hours per week, not just those spent training. Additionally, where employers can, they should top up the 80% of furlough funding to 100% for apprentices on low wages, to secure the finances of all the lowest paid apprentices.

4) Information, advice and guidance for young people considering apprenticeships should be protected. While young people are missing out on face-to-face- support and open days, outreach from employers, and support from schools and colleges should continue and be moved online where possible.

5) In order for apprenticeships to deliver on the levelling up agenda as we come out of the coronavirus crisis, social mobility and widening opportunity should be an explicit criterion in a review of the apprenticeships levy. The balance of apprenticeships across age groups, levels, those with equivalent or lower qualifications (ELQ) and existing versus new starters should be examined.

6) With the likelihood of limited funding in the future, it is even more vital that apprenticeship levy funding is focused in the right direction, to ensure both effectiveness and sustainability. The government should consider a maximum salary ceiling for levy-funded apprentices, ensuring that levy funding is not being spent on highly-paid and well-qualified senior staff. Other measures to reduce the strain on levy funding should also be considered, for instance, requiring employers to ‘top up’ levy funding for certain categories of apprentice, or otherwise incentivising apprenticeships most conducive to increasing opportunities for groups who need it most.

Read our report Degree Apprenticeships: Levelling Up?, here.