Richard Garner comments on the implications of the new Sutton Trust/SMF research on Open Access.

I will put my cards on the table. I would much rather have a system where every state school did their utmost to help their brightest pupils to shine – and there was no independent sector hiving off the cream of the talent.

The trouble is that is not going to happen – even at its most radical in office Labour got nowhere near taking any steps to abolish the private sector.

So there will always be private schools offering smaller class sizes and, as today’s research from the Social Market Foundation reveals, more teaching from staff with top class degrees – giving their pupils a leg up in the world of employment.

Whilst they still exist. it makes sense to try and ensure they take in as many children from disadvantaged homes as possible – so they have a better chance of accessing the richer rewards offered to an elite.

Open access schools could do that – especially if, as the report recommends, they nullify the advantage given to pupils from more affluent homes as a result of their families being able to afford coaching for the entrance test.  According to the SMF, the answer is simple: offer all those who cannot afford it coaching.

It will, of course be expensive – £215 million a year if today’s figures are right – and it would be interested to ponder what that money could achieve if spread around the existing state system but ponder this: are you confident of eradicating privilege in the education system?  If the answer is no, think again about how you can go about ensuring the disadvantaged have access to the best that is available.

See the original article here.

 

Media enquiries

If you're a journalist with a question about our work, get in touch with Sam or Rocky on the number below. The number is also monitored out of hours.

E: [email protected] T: 0204 536 4642

Keep up to date with the latest news